26| Biomatériaux Catalogue produits 2024 1 Schmitt et al. Histological results after maxillary sinus augmentation with Straumann® BoneCeramic, Bio-Oss®, Puros®, and autologous bone. A randomized controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013, 24, 576. 2 Solakoglu et al. Histological and immunohistochemical comparison of two different allogeneic bone grafting materials for alveolar ridge reconstruction: A prospective randomized trial in humans. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2019, 21, 1002-1016. 3 Kloss et al. Customized allogeneic bone grafts for maxillary horizontal augmentation: A 5-year follow-up radiographic and histologic evaluation. Clin Case Rep. 2020, 8, 5. 4 Wen et al. Time analysis of alveolar ridge preservation using a combination of mineralized bone-plug and dense-polytetrafluoroethylene membrane: A histomorphometric study. J Periodontol. 2020 Feb;91(2):215-222. 5 Kloss et al. Comparison of allogeneic and autogenous bone grafts for augmentation of alveolar ridge defects—A 12-month retrospective radiographic evaluation. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018, 29, 1163. 6 D ata on file, Shu-Thung Li, Ph. D. et al.: Isolation and Characterization of a Porous Carbonate Apatite From Porcine Cancellous Bone. Science, Technology, Innovation, Aug. 2014: 1–13. 7 Spense G, Patel N, Brooks R, Rushton N: Osteoclastogenesis on hydroxyapatite ceramics: the effect of carbonate substitution. J Biomed Mater Res A., Mar 15, 2010; 92(4):1292–300. 8 Ellies LG, Carter JM, Natiella JR, Featherstone JDB, Nelson DGA: Quantitative Analysis of Early In Vivo Tissue Response to Synthetic Apatite Implants. J Biomed Mater, 1988, Res 22:137–148. 9 Landi E, Celotti G, Logroscino G, Tampieri A: Carbonated Hydroxyapatite as Bone Substitute. Journal of the European Ceramic Society, 2003, 23:2931–2937. 10 Spense G, Patel N, Brooks R, Rushton N: Carbonate Substituted Hydroxyapatite: Resorption by Osteoclasts Modifies the Osteoblastic Response. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, 2009, Part A 217–224. 11 S hu-Tung Li, Hui-Chen Chen and Debbie Yuen: Comparison of a New Natural Bovine Bone Mineral (Carbonate Apatite Anorganic Bone) to Currently Marketed NuOss™ and Bio-Oss®: In Vitro and In Vivo Evaluations. Collagen Matrix, Inc., Oakland, New Jersey 07436. 12 G onshor A, Chris L Tye: Evaluation of Anorganic Bovine Bone Mineral in Post-extraction Alveolar Sockets: A Case Series. Journal of Osseointegration, March 2010; 1(2). 13 Riachi et al. Influence of material properties on rate of resorption of two bone graft materials after sinus lift using radiographic assessment. International journal of dentistry, Vol. 2012, p. 737262. 14 Lorean et al. Nasal floor elevation combined with dental implant placement: a long-term report of up to 86 months. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 29 (3), 705-708. May-Jun 2014. 15 Tawil et al. Sinus Floor Elevation Using the Lateral Approach and Bone Window Repositioning I: Clinical and Radiographic Results in 102 Consecutively Treated Patients Followed from 1 to 5 Years. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2016 Jul-Aug;31(4):827-34. 16 B inderman et al. Tissue Engineering of Bone: Critical Evaluation of Scaffold Selection. Haim Tal, IntechOpen. April 4th 2012. 17 J elusic et al. Monophasic ß-TCP vs. biphasic HA/ß-TCP in two-stage sinus floor augmentation procedures - a prospective randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017 Oct;28(10):e175-e183. 18 L orenz et al. Investigation of peri-implant tissue conditions and peri-implant tissue stability in implants placed with simultaneous augmentation procedure: a 3-year retrospective follow-up analysis of a newly developed bone level implant system. Int J Implant Dent. 2017 Sep 5;3(1):41. 19 D ata on file, Li ST, Yuen D, Martin D, Lee NS: A comparative study of a new porcine collagen membrane to BioGide®. Science, Technology, Innovation. February 1–5, 2015. 20 Rothamel et al. Biocompatibility and biodegradation of a native porcine pericardium membrane: results of in vitro and in vivo examinations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2012 27(1):146-54. 21 Barbeck et al. Porcine Dermis and Pericardium-Based, Non-Cross-Linked Materials Induce Multinucleated Giant Cells After Their In Vivo Implantation: A Physiological Reaction? J Oral Implantol. 2015 41(6):e267-81. 22 Kloss et al. Comparison of allogeneic and autogenous bone grafts for augmentation of alveolar ridge defects-A 12-month retrospective radiographic evaluation. Clin Oral Impl Res. 2018 29:1163–1175. 23 D ata on file, Debbie Yuen et al.: Prediction of in vivo stability of a resorbable, reconstituted type I collagen membrane by in vitro methods. World Biomaterials Congress Transactions, Sixth World Biomaterials Congress Transactions. Collagen Matrix Inc., Franklin Lakes, NJ 07417 USA 24 Zafiropoulos et al. Open-Healing Socket Preservation with a Novel Dense Polytetrafluoroethylene (dPTFE) Membrane: A Retrospective Clinical Study. Medicina (Kaunas). 2020 Apr 28;56(5):216. 25 Papi et al. The Use of a Non-Absorbable Membrane as an Occlusive Barrier for Alveolar Ridge Preservation: A One Year Follow-Up Prospective Cohort Study. Antibiotics (Basel). 2020 Mar 3;9(3):110. 26 Data on file, Allergan. NovoMatrix™ – Mechanical testing, Preclinical Data. 27 D ata on file, Allergan. INT/0204/2018. 28 S uárez-López Del Amo F, Rodriguez JC, Asa‘ad F, Wang HL. Comparison of two soft tissue substitutes for the treatment of gingival recession defects: an animal histological study. J Appl Oral Sci., 2019;27:e20180584. 29 R eference manufacturer’s Instructions for Use (IFU) package insert. 30 G riffin T, Cheung W, Athanasios Z, Damoulis P. Postoperative Complications Following Gingival Augmentation Procedures. J Periodontology 2006;77:2070-2079. 31 A guirre-Zorzano LA, García-De La Fuente AM, Estefanía-Fresco R, Marichalar-Mendía X. Complications of harvesting a connective tissue graft from the palate. A retrospective study and description of a new technique. J Clin Exp Dent. 2017;9(12):e1439-45. 32 T avelli L, Asa’ad F, Acunzo R, Pagni G, Consonni D, Rasperini G. Minimizing Patient Morbidity Following Palatal Gingival Harvesting: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Study. The International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry 38(6):e127-e134 · November 2018. 33 H arper JR, McQuillan DJ. Extracellular wound matrices: a novel regenerative tissue matrix (RTM) technology for connective tissue reconstruction. Wounds. 2007;19(6):163-168. 34 S andor M, Leamy P, Assan P, et al. Relevant in vitro predictors of human acellular dermal matrix-associated inflammation and capsule formation in a nonhuman primate subcutaneous tissue expander model. Eplasty. 2017;17:e1-e21. 35 X u H, Wan H, Sandor M, et al. Host response to human acellular dermal matrix transplantation in a primate model abdominal wall repair. Tissue Eng Part A. 2008;14(2):2009-2019. 36 V an Orten A. Peri-implant thickening of soft tissue – stable and functional. Implantologie Journal 5 | 2020. 37 S andor M, Xu H, Connor J, et al. Host response to implanted porcine-derived biologic materials in a primate model of abdominal wall repair. Tissue Eng Part A. 2008;14(12):2021-2031. 38 N uyttens BP et al. Platelet adhesion to collagen. Thromb Res. 2011 Jan; 127. Les sources relatives à chacun des articles sélectionnés et contrôlés sont enregistrées dans le code QR. www.camlog.de/literatur-verweise-biomaterialien Références
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTE0MzMw